I am not convinced that failure is an essential
attribute of noise. If noise oscillates between itself (apparent non-meaning)
and music (meaning) it does so through subjectivity, making the idea of failure
fundamentally unessential. Noise can only be said to fail if we stay with noise
as the taboo, the unwanted, Bataillean excess, interruption, disturbance and
nausea. Noise would be said to fail as it is curtailed, brought into meaning,
unable to disrupt absolutely the economy of limits it works so ardently
against. Certainly the excess of noise only exceeds against the limit it sets
itself against and by that, it is forever in its debt. But how is the person
familiar with noise, the fan of Merzbow who has listened since '79, who no
longer hears taboo and unwanted sound, how is this person to think of noise?
Yes, noise fails if its original unwantedness suddenly becomes wanted, noise
would be said fail to stay noise as it becomes something other, something
palatable, something non-threatening. But noise has been within meaning and
appropriated as music for a long time now, and the idea of an outside economy
of noise as taboo seems outdated. Noise is and has been for some time, wanted
by many and where want names not a sadomasochistic relation but pleasure in a
linear sense. So if noise no longer fails, does transgression die with it? Not
if we push the language of noise to a language of slippage that risks falling
into silence. Transgression would then be embedded so deeply within the limit
that it would fundamentally constitute it. Noise would not then figure as a positive
statement of a negative attribute, failing being the very success of its
transgressive insistence to disrupt the economy of music. Instead, noise would
name the fundamental lack, gap, distance and absolute alterity as it figures in
language and reception. Noise would name the difference and instability of
conceptuality and music as an always already ruptured, in a way that the il y a names a distance within Blanchotian
language. And just as Kafka would be said to be vigilant over this distance,
Merzbow would likewise be said to be a vigilant artist instead of an artist of
failure.